The Experimentation Edge
Filter results

How Fin went from weeks to hours of analysis using AI

Inside The Home Depot's experimentation at a $25B scale

How Disney picks which experiments to run

Ship faster, measure better: experimentation tips from JPMorgan Chase

Twitch on why false negatives kill product ideas

Squarespace killed its blank template and built something better

Signet Jeweler's "View All" page made more money by showing less

RingCentral's DART framework: The four metrics that actually measure AI agents

The 2% close rate increase that turned Ford Credit's product teams into believers

Atlassian on the talent product turnaround from A/B testing

How DoorDash saved millions with one A/B test

How UPS generated half a billion from 80+ Apps with A/B testing

How experimentation led to annual growth at Fanatics
Top takeaways from our favorite conversations

Unblock teams: create a center of excellence for data science and enable rapid variants with AI-powered tooling.

Shift from MVP to MVT: list leap-of-faith assumptions and design minimum viable tests before you build.

Win rate matters less than learnings per test — DoorDash ships company-wide experiment summaries (win or lose) that the CEO actively reads and responds to, creating cultural accountability around testing rigor.

A feature that fails early in a flow can succeed later; placement and timing often matter more than the idea itself.

One centralized team of about 40 people tests every major change to Home Depot's $25B online business, serving 40–50 business teams with consistent hypothesis and analysis standards.

Separate your two experimentation modes: high-volume CRO chases many small wins, while big uncertain bets deserve multiple shots to de-risk.

DoorDash's price experiment proved price by itself doesn't predict orders. Different customers want different things at different times, which pushed the team toward personalization.

Documenting experiments in a centralized Wiki creates a growth flywheel: Fanatics' Wiki feeds their roadmap with iterations on already-built features, reducing tech dependency and accelerating velocity.

Test metrics before you test features — usage time could signal engagement or just mean your product takes too long to do its job.

Scale experimentation with AI: use Cursor desktop/cloud agents for parallel builds and visual QA; orchestrate docs/analysis via Claude; automate cleanups and reporting.

False negatives are more dangerous than false positives — they get institutionalized as "we tried that, it didn't work" and quietly kill good ideas for years.

Top-down buy-in shifts the conversation from "why test?" to "how do we test?": When leadership treats data as the tiebreaker, teams stop defending opinions and start building better experiments.

The biggest thing that gets a team testing is to just do it. Stop designing the perfect experiment and get something simple live to take away the mystery.

Twitch used geo-fenced experiments with matched markets and causal inference to measure true price elasticity, turning a feared pricing decision into a measured, accretive one.

Massey's first test removed navigation from UPS's shipping checkout flow and delivered $35 million in incremental revenue—proving e-commerce best practices apply even when customers think "this is just a tool, not e-commerce."

Share losses as openly as wins. Wins build credibility, and losses build the psychological safety a testing culture runs on.

When you struggle to land a result, lead with the story of what the customer did, then bring the numbers.





.svg.avif)